The first global case of government-commissioned deliberative polling (DP) for developing the Strategy for Innovative Energy and Environment was held in August 2012. In the following October, we investigated the public evaluation of the policymaking process, focusing on the standpoint of citizens' perception of procedural fairness. We also explored the effects of procedural fairness of both DP and "Public Debates" on the social acceptance of the strategy, including DP, the public debate process, trust in the government, and the pros and cons of nuclear electric power generation. We administered an online survey to 2,000 Japanese residents. The findings were as follows: (a) the main determinants for procedural fairness in DP were "extent of deliberations" and "diversity and comprehensiveness of panel of experts"; (b) the main determinants for procedural fairness in "Public Debates" were "reflection of the policy" and "information disclosure"; (c) that of "procedural fairness evaluation in 'Public Debates,' " "DP," and "trust in the government" promoted public acceptance of the strategy. We discussed the importance of procedural fairness in environmental policymaking; public acceptance of a policy is not only affected by the procedural fairness for the entire citizen participation process, but also by each type of citizen participation.
The purpose of this research is to investigate the effects of compensation framing on acceptance of a high level radioactive waste (HLW) geological repository. Monetary compensation is sometimes provided for local governments as a benefit for accepting certain risks. However, Fray et al. (1996) demonstrated that monetary compensation failed to procure acceptance of a nuclear waste disposal repository. In reality, offering to improve social welfare is also sometimes used as compensation for accepting a risky facility. From the above, we hypothesized that monetary compensations would be rejected by residents of proposed site. To test these hypotheses, we conducted a scenario experiment. We conducted a web-based survey and obtained 1200 valid Japanese responses. The results demonstrated that there were no main effects of condition, which suggested that the framing of compensation had no significant impact on acceptance of a HLW geological repository.
"Waste stations", where residents dispose of household waste, are usually maintained by the residents themselves; however, not all stations are well maintained. It was hypothesized that the level of waste station maintenance would correlate with the degree of social ties in the community, and would be influenced by local environment in the area around the waste station. A combination of observational and survey research methods were employed to test these hypotheses. Self-reported inappropriate disposal behavior and social ties were measured using a questionnaire survey, while the level of maintenance of waste stations and local surrounding environment were recorded using observational methods. Data from 508 residents, assigned to 102 waste stations in 23 local areas of Sapporo, Japan, were analyzed. Sequential regression analysis indicated that social ties in the community was the stronger predictor of the management level of waste station than the self-report disposal behavior. Furthermore, multi-level model tests revealed that the level of management of waste stations was predicted by the local surrounding environment, which provided spatial reminders of community interactions. This indicates that managing the local surrounding environment is an important intervention to encourage appropriate waste station management.