Iwashita Akihiro

Slavic-Eurasian Research CenterProfessor
Last Updated :2025/12/04

■Researcher basic information

Researchmap personal page

Research Keyword

  • Global Risk Studies
  • Area Studies (Northeast Asia)
  • Border Studies
  • Tourism Studies
  • Geo-politics

Research Field

  • Humanities & social sciences, Local studies, Border Studies
  • Humanities & social sciences, Politics

Educational Organization

■Career

Position History

  • スラブ・ユーラシア研究センター長, 2020年4月1日 - 2022年3月31日
  • 教育研究評議会評議員, 2020年4月1日 - 2022年3月31日

■Research activity information

Awards

  • 2019, International Boundaries Research Unit, Durham University, Milefsky Award               
  • 2015, 北海道大学, 研究総長賞(優秀賞)               
  • 2012, 北海道大学, 研究総長賞               
  • 2011, ブックインとっとり, 第24回地方出版文化功労賞               
    岩下 明裕
  • 2007, 日本学術振興会, 第4回日本学術振興会賞               
    Japan
  • 2006, 朝日新聞社, 第6回大佛次郎論壇賞               
    Japan
  • 1999, 山口女子大学, 桜圃学術賞(第1回)               

Papers

  • ウクライナ戦争に関するアンケート調査結果報告書 2023 年度版
    岩下 明裕
    境界研究, 別冊, 1, 30, 2023, [Peer-reviewed]
    Scientific journal
  • 「ポスト冷戦期」の終焉と日本の危機—ウクライナ戦争に翻弄される世界
    岩下 明裕
    中央公論, 136, 8, 86, 93, 東京 : 中央公論新社, Aug. 2022
    Japanese
  • 「解放」という名の侵略—総特集 ウクライナから問う : 歴史・政治・文化
    岩下 明裕
    現代思想, 50, 6, 103, 108, 東京 : 青土社, Jun. 2022
    Japanese
  • 特集 地政学ルネサンスを超えて : 地理学と政治学の対話 : ラウンドテーブル 『現代地政学事典』(丸善、2020年)
    高木 彰彦, 山﨑 孝史, 古川 浩司, 香川 雄一, 川久保 文紀, 北川 眞也, 岩下 明裕
    境界研究, 11, 55, 84, Eurasia Unit for Border Reaseach (Japan), 31 Mar. 2021
    Japanese, Research institution
  • Bordering and scaling Northeast Asia
    Edward Boyle, Akihiro Iwashita
    Asian Geographer, 38, 2, 119, 138, Informa UK Limited, 08 Mar. 2021, [Peer-reviewed]
    Scientific journal
  • Political Lessons Never Learned for Japan’s Foreign Policy: Soviet/Russian Diplomacy toward China and Japan
    IWASHITA Akihiro
    International Relations, 2020, 201, 201_17, 201_32, JAPAN ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 15 Sep. 2020, [Peer-reviewed]
    Japanese, Scientific journal, What do we consider as the Soviet/Russian foreign policy toward East Asia? Many historians tend to discuss its nature using an “expansionist” model in general, particularly in Europe. This may differ in terms of discourse: some have emphasized the security factor against neighbors, while others have focused on ideology as “socialist” in the Cold War era and “Eurasia” in the present day. However, the recent development of Soviet/Russian studies accents more on the “pragmatic” and “state-interested” based causes for policy orientation.

    As background, this paper sheds a light on comparative studies of Soviet/Russian foreign behavior toward China and Japan. In contrast with the European/Atlantic front, Soviet/Russian behaviors have been more “moderate” and “restraint” toward East Asia/Pacific before/after the Cold War period. Indeed, it depends on the difference of Soviet/Russian power influence between Europe and East Asia. How have the Soviet Union/Russia dealt with China and Japan in East Asia/Pacific? For the Soviet Union/Russia, China and Japan have been big powers to manage for security as an “enemy” or as a “friend” in triangular relations dependent on historical factors.

    This paper focuses on the foreign activities of Khrushchev era to Putin via Gorbachev. It is well known that Khrushchev’s foreign policy of “peaceful coexistence,” which tried to use “space” between “friend and enemy,” triggered a more pragmatic and flexible orientation than the predecessor’s dichotomy. At the time, with the Soviet Union facing territorial/border disputes with China, a communist ally, and with Japan, a potential enemy under US control, Khrushchev decided to deal with each in a different way: For Japan, a promise in the 1956 joint declaration for the handing over of two islands, Shikotan and Habomai, but for China, the ignoring of its demand for re-bordering the Amur and Ussuri rivers after the negotiations of the mid-1960s. As a result, war with China started while a deal with Japan was frozen mostly because of US pressure on Japan.

    The failure of Khrushchev’s foreign policy impacted his successor’s decision. The lessons brought about Gorbachev’s success on the border agreement with China in 1989 and Putin’s follow-up on finalizing the remaining border issues in 2004. It also framed Russia’s policy toward Japan. Gorbachev never recognized Khrushchev’s failed proposal of the 1956 declaration and Putin, recognizing the validity of the declaration, has strictly demanded that Japan depart from US influence as a condition of Khrushchev’s deal. As a result, Russia has enjoyed its best relationship with Japan while using the “territorial card” as a theoretical concession of the 1956 declaration to keep Japan from going against Russia.

    This paper draws conclusions from the transformation of the Soviet and Russian foreign policy toward China and Japan. It also suggests lessons gleaned from Russo-Japan relations for academics and foreign policy circles in Japan and Asia.
  • Reconsidering Soviet and Russian Foreign Policy: Geo-politics, Identity and Power
    Iwashita Akihiro
    Russian and East European Studies, 2020, 49, 62, 81, The Japanese Association for Russian and East European Studies, 2020, [Peer-reviewed]
    Japanese, Scientific journal, This essay sheds light on Soviet and Russian Foreign Policy through use of the “critical geopolitical” concept of the “geo-code.” A state’s “geo-code” refers to the construction of narratives regarding its own space and history over time. Borrowing from Klaus Dodd’s ideal-type categories, which he uses to explain geo-coded narratives of British policy (“little England,” “cosmopolitan,” “European” and “American”), this paper proposes to utilize combinations of four ideal-type categories, “Atlantic/European,” “ethnic Russian,” “Eurasian” and “super power,” in order to analyze and explain Soviet and Russian foreign policy.

    The first section applies the metaphor of a photograph to the memoirs of several foreign policy leaders: Andrei Gromyko and Eduard Shevardnadze in the Soviet-era; and Andrei Kozyrev, Evgenii Primakov and Serghei Ivanov in contemporary Russia. The paper shows how the composite image of Russia held by these individuals shaped the state’s foreign policy. It also stresses that different concepts of sovereignty have been sustained or reconstructed within Soviet/Russian international law theories in dialogue with changes in images held by the foreign policy leader.

    The latter half of the paper further develops this theory in order to apply it to Putin’s current Russian foreign policy perception of Northeast Asia, and particularly of China and Japan. From the late Soviet period under Gorbachev to the early Russian period of Yeltsin, Japan was considered as one of the “rising” powers able to aid Russia’s political and economic transition, and it was widely recognized that the relationship would be facilitated by a peace treaty resolving the territorial issue between the two countries. However, following reconciliation between Russia and China, China became the more important partner for Russia, not only in Northeast Asia but also throughout Eurasia.

    Following its disengagement with the West after the Ukraine crisis in 2014, Russia’s image of itself as close to “Europe” slipped, while that of the state as “ethnic Russian” and “Eurasian” that must become a “great power” to oppose the US was emphasized. This has meant that Japan is no longer an essential partner from the viewpoint of Russia’s dominant foreign policy images. In turn, the significance of China has increased and developed for Russia beyond the two countries historical “love-hate” relationship. Not only policy makers but also ordinary people look to China as Russia’s “No.1” partner, while the United States is its indefatigable “enemy.” There is no room for Japan in this picture while Japan remains so dependent on the US for security matters.

    In the conclusion, the paper debunks the myths associated with “classical geopolitics,” which associate foreign policy solely with perceptions of state power and geography. It shows that a “geo-politics” which links the positivist and constructive approaches, and which seeks to account for various analytical scales—from micro to macro, below/beyond the state—can analyze foreign policy change more effectively.
  • ディスカッション 進化するボーダースタディーズ : 私たちの現場とツーリズム
    岩下 明裕
    境界研究, 9, 9, 91, 112, Eurasia Unit for Border Reaseach (Japan), 2019, [Peer-reviewed]
    Japanese, Research institution
  • 北方領土問題への墓標 : 2016年12月安倍・プーチン会談という歴史的転換—地理の研究(196) ; 特集 政治と地理
    岩下 明裕
    歴史と地理 / 山川出版社 編, 196, 703, 10, 17,図巻頭1p, 東京 : 山川出版社, Apr. 2017
    Japanese, Scientific journal
  • ボーダースタディーズからみた世界と秩序
    岩下 明裕
    『相関地域研究2』 融解と再創造の世界秩序(村上勇介、帯谷知可編著), 2巻, 24, 48, 2016, [Peer-reviewed]
    Scientific journal
  • 解説 世界を変えるボーダースタディーズ
    岩下 明裕
    境界から世界を見る:ボーダースタディーズ入門 (A・ディーナー/J・へーガン(川久保文紀訳)), -, 173, 182, 2016
    Scientific journal
  • ボーダースタディーズへの招待
    岩下 明裕, 高木 彰彦
    地理, 61, 4, 68, 74, 東京 : 古今書院, 2016
    Japanese
  • 構築される領土:竹島、尖閣、北方領土
    岩下 明裕
    地理, 61, 11, 73, 81, 古今書院, 2016
    Japanese, Scientific journal
  • Inside and Outside Alliances: Russia's Eastern Frontiers During the Cold War and After
    IWASHITA Akihiro
    Journal of Borderlands Studies, 32, 1, 55, 70, 2016, [Peer-reviewed]
    English, Scientific journal
  • (補論)ユーラシアの新しい「三角形」を求めて
    岩下 明裕, 田畑 伸一郎
    岩下明裕編著『ユーラシア国際秩序の再編』ミネルヴァ書房, 3, 203, 217, 2013
    Scientific journal
  • 「グローバル・ユーラシア:新しい地政学の創造」塩川伸明・小松久男・沼野充義編
    岩下 明裕
    『ユーラシア世界5 国家と国際関係』, 東京大学出版会, 43, 65, 2012
    Scientific journal
  • 国境離島の相克:ナショナリズムの向こう側
    岩下 明裕
    都市問題, 103, 8, 75, 83, 後藤・安田記念東京都市研究所, 2012
    Japanese, Scientific journal
  • One Island, Two Countries : A Sino-Russian Bordering Disputed space
    岩下 明裕, 伊藤 薫
    境界研究, 3号, 3, 135, 146, 北海道大学スラブ研究センター内 グローバルCOEプログラム「境界研究の拠点形成:スラブ・ユーラシアと世界」, 2012, [Peer-reviewed]
    Japanese, Research institution
  • 書評 山﨑孝史『政治・空間・場所 : 「政治の地理学」にむけて』
    Iwashita Akihiro
    境界研究, 2, 203, 206, 北海道大学スラブ研究センター内 グローバルCOEプログラム「境界研究の拠点形成:スラブ・ユーラシアと世界」, 25 Nov. 2011
    Japanese, Research institution
  • An Invitation to Japan’s Borderlands: At the Geopolitical Edge of the Eurasian Continent               
    IWASHITA Akihiro
    Journal of Borderlands Studies, 26, 279, 282, 2011, [Peer-reviewed]
    English, Scientific journal
  • 「4でも0でも、2でもなく」再論
    岩下 明裕
    『20世紀ロシア史と日露関係の展望』(松井康浩編著), 189, 214, 2010
    Scientific journal
  • What is Border Studies?
    Iwashita Akihiro
    International Relations, 162, 162, 1, 8, JAPAN ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2010, [Peer-reviewed]
    Japanese, Scientific journal, Border studies is an unknown field of study in Japan but has a certain presence in the West Coast of the US and Europe. The Association for Borderlands Studies (ABS), initiated in 1976 by US-Mexico borderlands researchers in Texas, Arizona and New Mexico, has gradually expanded its sphere of influence to include the US-Canadian borderlands, and currently is the largest borderlands society in the Western Social Science Association in the US. The International Boundaries Research Unit (IBRU) at Durham University, established in 1989 at the beginning of the post-Cold War era, conducts research for boundary management and for the peaceful resolution of territorial issues. Border Regions in Transition (BRIT), whose first gathering was in Berlin in 1994, grew from a European into an overseas network, including North and South America.
    However, East Asia and Eurasia have remained isolated and segregated from the networks of worldwide border studies. Though Japan is an island nation faced with serious border issues, most of Japan's inhabitants are unaware of the realities surrounding Japan's borders. Moreover, the “international” border studies community knows little about Russia and China because of linguistic barriers (most resources are not available in English) and political barriers (too delicate for study in the former communist borderlands).
    What aspects of border studies currently should we focus on? Border studies originally focused on international law theory and geographic practice for the allocation, delimitation, demarcation and management of boundaries. As time passed, border studies advanced beyond the sovereign and territorial characteristics in a “physical” sense and deepened its scope to include “mental” (metaphysical) analysis of border and border-related representations. Perceptions of the border are also factored in. For example, where is the line separating “Europe/non-Europe” in the consciousness of the people in “common” Europe? What is “Asia”? Is an “Asian value” shared among Asian people? This kind of “mental” border studies should be integrated collaboratively with studies focusing on the more “visible” and “physical” issues of demarcation, migration and its management on/around the borderlands.
    In a few words, sociology, cultural studies and the other humanities hold undiscovered potential and offer opportunities to explore new frontiers of border studies in collaboration with the “old” disciplines.
    We would like you to join our project to reshape Japan's border studies and to develop an inter-disciplinary and multi-spherical research field.
  • 上海合作組織與日本 : 一起行動重新機建構欧亜共同体
    岩下 明裕
    俄羅斯中亜東欧研究 3, 92, 94, 2008, [Peer-reviewed]
    Scientific journal
  • 上海協力機構-「反米」ゲームの誘惑に抗して
    岩下 明裕
    宇山智彦、クリストファー・レン、廣瀬徹也編『日本の中央アジア外交-試される地域戦略』北海道大学出版会, 115, 132, 2008
    Scientific journal
  • ユーラシアとアジアの様々な三角形――国境政治学試論
    岩下 明裕
    家田修編著『講座スラブ・ユーラシア学:開かれた地域研究へ』講談社, 1, 197, 220, 2008
    Scientific journal
  • Russia and its neighbors in crisis
    岩下, 明裕, Eager Eyes Fixed on Slavic Eurasia: Change and Progress
    Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University, 2007
    English
  • Russia and its eastern edge
    岩下, 明裕, Eager Eyes Fixed on Slavic Eurasia: Change and Progress
    Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University, 2007
    English
  • Khrushchev's Japan Policy : Implications of the Failed Two-Island Option
    Iwashita Akihiro
    Roshiashi kenkyu, 80, 80, 45, 59, Japanese Society for the Study of Russian History, 2007, [Peer-reviewed]
    Japanese, Scientific journal, This paper focuses on the Soviet attitude towards border delimitation between the Soviet Union and Japan before/during negotiations on normalizing relations after WWII. The so-called "four island" issue, e.g. Japan's strong territorial claims on Etorofu, Kunashiri, Shikotan and Habomai islets, was then not mentioned. The name of "northern territory" was given to the four islands in the 1960s only after the Soviet Union and Japan failed to sign the peace treaty. The normalization process between the Soviet Union and Japan in the 1950s presents the essential items for academic inquiry: Did the Soviet leadership have an option to return the four islands to Japan? Why did Nikiita Khrushchev suddenly propose to hand back the two islands, Shikotan and Habomai, to Japan during the London negotiations in 1955? Was there really a possibility that Japan would accept the two island proposal and sign the peace treaty? Why did the Soviet Union and Japan finally agree to sign the joint declaration in October of 1956 as proof of normalization and put a clause onto the declaration that stated the two islands would be transferred to Japan after the peace treaty was signed? Russian President Vladimir Putin has renewed Khrushchev's early position. Many hints for breaking the deadlock over the "northern territorial" disputes between the Soviet Union/Russia and Japan are furnished there.
  • 「9.11」とユーラシアの四角形
    岩下 明裕
    日本比較政治学会年報 「テロは政治をいかに変えたか―比較政治学的考察―」, 9, 1, 77, 日本比較政治学会, 2007, [Peer-reviewed]
    Japanese, Scientific journal
  • The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Japan-Moving Together to Reshape the Eurasian Community               
    Toward a New Dialogue on Eurasia:The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Its Partners, 59, 64, 2007
  • 「北方領土問題」に関するアンケート・世論調査
    岩下 明裕, 北海道新聞情報研究所
    『日ロ関係の新しいアプローチを求めて』21 世紀COE プログラム「スラブ・ユーラシア学の構築」研究報告集, 15, 15, 1, 63, 北海道大学スラブ研究センター, 2006
    Japanese, Scientific journal
  • プーチン政権下の対中国アプローチとその特徴
    岩下 明裕
    『ロシア外交の現在 II』21 世紀COEプログラム「スラブ・ユーラシア学の構築」研究報告集, 14, 13, 23, 北海道大学スラブ研究センター, 2006
    Japanese, Scientific journal
  • 中・ロ国境問題の最終決着に関する覚え書—ユーラシア国境政治--ロシア・中国・中央アジア
    岩下 明裕
    「スラブ・ユーラシア学の構築」研究報告集, 8, 73, 81, 札幌 : 北海道大学スラブ研究センター, Jul. 2005
    Japanese, Scientific journal
  • An Inquiry for "New Thinking" on the Sino-Russian Border Disputes
    Iwashita Akihiro
    法政研究, 71, 4, 229, 246, Hosei Gakkai (Institute for Law and Politics) Kyushu University, 09 Mar. 2005, [Peer-reviewed]
    Japanese, Research institution, はじめに 1 「フィフティ・フィフティの原則」の形成…河川国境におけるハサン・スピリット 2 「共同利用」とチタ・イニシャティヴ 3 交渉のプロセスに関する枠組 おわりに
  • Опыт российско-китайских пограничных переговоров: применим ли он к территориальному вопросу между Россией и Японией?
    Акихиро Ивасита
    Making a dicsipline of Slavic Eurasian studies Occasional papers, 6, 67, 80, 北海道大学スラブ研究センター, 2005
    Russian
  • Вокруг проблемы российско-китайской границы               
    Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 2, 97, 104, 2005, [Peer-reviewed]
  • ロシアの対中国外交:「チャイナシンドローム」を越えて
    岩下 明裕
    東アジアのロシア, 67, 88, 2004
    Scientific journal
  • キルギスタン・タジキスタンの対外関係
    岩下 明裕
    イラク戦争後のプーチン政権の対中央アジア政策, 17, 30, 2004
    Scientific journal
  • The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Its Implications for Eurasian Security: A New Dimension of "Partnership"after the Post-Cold War Period               
    Slavic Eurasian Studies, 2, 259, 281, 2003
  • 9・11事件以後の中露関係
    岩下 明裕
    特集:9.11事件以後のロシア外交の新展開(松井弘明編), 85, 230, 2003
    Scientific journal
  • CISとロシア:選択的重層アプローチの形成と展開               
    CIS: 旧ソ連空間の再構成, 185, 205, 2003
  • CISと国際関係:ウクライナ・コーカサス・中央アジア               
    CIS: 旧ソ連空間の再構成, 176, 184, 2003
  • 中央アジアをめぐる中ロ関係               
    『中央アジアをめぐる新たな国勢情勢の展開』, 59, 78, 2003
  • プーチン時代のロシア外交--対中国関係を手がかりに—特集2 プーチンの外交
    岩下 明裕
    ユーラシア研究 = Eurasian studies / ユーラシア研究所 編, 27, 28, 33, 東京 : ユーラシア研究所 ; 1993-, Nov. 2002
    Japanese
  • 上海プロセスの軌跡と展望--ソ連崩壊から機構設立まで—特集 多様化の中のCIS
    岩下 明裕
    ロシア研究 / 『ロシア研究』編集委員会 編, 34, 96, 113, 東京 : 日本国際問題研究所, Apr. 2002, [Peer-reviewed]
    Japanese, Scientific journal
  • The Initialization of Russo-Chinese Border Relations : The Russian Chita Region and Chinese Inner Mongolia
    IWASHITA Akihiro
    Bulletin of the Faculty of International Studies, Yamaguchi Prefectural University, 7, 7, 38_a, 25_a, Yamaguchi Prefectural University, 25 Mar. 2001
    Japanese
  • The Reality of the Chinese Dream for Tumen River Development : The Eastern Border in Sino-Russian Relations
    IWASHITA Akihiro
    Bulletin of the Faculty of International Studies, Yamaguchi Prefectural University, 6, 6, 114_a, 103_a, Yamaguchi Prefectural University, 25 Mar. 2000
    Japanese
  • Central Asia in Russo-Chinese Relations
    Iwashita Akihiro
    Bulletin of the Graduate Schools, Yamaguchi Prefectural University, 1, 1, 3, 17, Yamaguchi Prefectural University, 25 Mar. 2000
    Japanese, This paper aims to analyze the key issues concerning Central Asia in Russo-Chinese relations after the Cold War. First, it reviews the Russian foreign commitment to Central Asia, which focuses on security items for the border and ex-patriots, which are vital to Russian interests. Second, it pays much attention to the Chinese attitude towards Russian policy on Central Asia, which China has recognized as a sphere of Russian influence. As its future is uncertain, China has supported the Russian presence there. It should keep close and stable relations with Russia to concentrate its resources for economic and political development as a "great power."
  • 書評論文 「蘇聯解体后的中俄関係」劉徳喜・孫岩・劉宋斌「中国和新独立的中亞国家関係」〔ケイ〕广程--中国における旧ソ連研究
    岩下 明裕, 哈日 巴拉
    スラヴ研究 = Slavic studies, 47, 47, 385, 395, 札幌 : 北海道大学スラブ・ユーラシア研究センター, 2000, [Peer-reviewed]
    Japanese, Research institution, コレクション : 国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション > 電子書籍・電子雑誌 > 学術機関 > 国立大学
    記事種別: 書評
  • 1991年中露東部国境協定の内実--「交渉の現場」から—特集:ユーラシア世界のダイナミズム--秋野豊氏追悼号
    岩下 明裕
    ロシア研究 / 『ロシア研究』編集委員会 編, 28, 59, 74, 東京 : 日本国際問題研究所, Apr. 1999
    Japanese, 資料形態 : テキストデータ プレーンテキスト
    コレクション : 国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション > デジタル化資料 > 雑誌
  • CIS : The Voice of International Law Specialists in the former Soviet Union (Japanese version)
    Iwashita Akihiro
    政治研究, 46, 129, 146, 九州大学法学部政治研究室, 31 Mar. 1999
    Japanese, Research institution, はじめに―資料の構成 1 CISの現状と展望 2 CIS諸国の相互関係における若干の法的諸問題 3 回答者のプロフィール
    А. Ивасита сост., Вэгляд на СНГ : Специалиаты по международному праву иэ России, Украины, Белоруссии и другихстран о проблемах Содружества, Саппоро, 1998
  • <研究ノート>从遠東俄羅斯看中国 1996-1997 年
    IWASHITA Akihiro
    Bulletin of the Faculty of International Studies, Yamaguchi Prefectural University, 5, 72_a, 65_a, Yamaguchi Prefectural University, 25 Mar. 1999
    Chinese
  • The Russian Far East's Views on China: 1996-1997
    Iwashita Akihiro
    Russian and East European Studies, 1998, 27, 74, 81, THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION FOR RUSSIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN STUDIES, 1998, [Peer-reviewed]
    Japanese
  • The Russian Far East's Views on China
    IWASHITA Akihiro
    Bulletin of the Faculty of International Studies, Yamaguchi Prefectural University, 3, 87_a, 75_a, Yamaguchi Prefectural University, 25 Mar. 1997
    Japanese
  • Europe : Contemporary : Eastern Europe (Historical Studies in Japan,1995)
    IWASHITA Akihiro
    SHIGAKU ZASSHI, 105, 5, 375, 380, The Historical Society of Japan, 1996
    Japanese, 資料形態 : テキストデータ プレーンテキスト
    コレクション : 国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション > デジタル化資料 > 雑誌
  • Beyond the "Post-Cold War Syndrome"--The Case of Russian Foreign Policy
    IWASHITA Akihiro
    International relations, 111, 111, 34, 50,9-10, JAPAN ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 1996, [Peer-reviewed]
    Japanese, In contemporary international relations, after the breakdown of “Berlin Wall”, the end of East-West conflicts, and expectation for the “New World Order”, we lose theoretical and practical perspectives for assessing the future. We face extreme nationalism, for example, in the ex-Soviet Union and ex-Yugoslavia, and a so-called “New World Disorder”, which might be caused by collapses of the existing national borders.
    Of couse, Gorvachev's perestroika foreign policy replaced the “Cold War” with a new East-West relationship, which ended the bipolar world order divided by two social systems. The prevention of East-West conflicts and closer relationships between the the ex-Soviet Union and the United States under the “Post-Cold War” period was said to be a prologue to the “New Order” constituted beyond the “national interests”, under the “common human interest”. After the Gulf War, a new type of cooperation between the “great powers” has started by use of the United Nations. In 1992, a new General Secretary of the United Nations, Boutros Ghali, being to consider how it should be reorganized, issued his plan (“An Agenda for Peace”).
    The uneasiness of conversion from a socialist state to capitalist, or the posibility of escalation of national conflicts, involving bloodshed, caused by the loss the existing social system and the collapse of state integrity, led us to a different perspective. Instability in-and-around the ex-Soviet Union, the civil war in the ex-Yugoslavia, especially Bosnia-Herzegovina's case, is serious. The U. N. and the U. S. do not have enough power to control such a situation.
    In addition to that, Russo-West relations are worsening day by day, because of the plan to lift the arms embargo to Croatia and widen the membership of NATO to include the former East and Soviet Republics. The “happy song” has seemed to turn into a “sad melody”.
    I want to name this rapid change the “Post Cold War Syndrome”, which is very dangerous for a researcher when she or he analyses the “Post Cold War world”. I think that pessimism over the present situation, which is sometimes called the “Cold Peace”, has countered the optimistic perspectives towards the end of “Cold War” and the “New World Order” initiated by perestroika.
    I will choose as a clue to analize this “Syndrome” a case study of Russian foreign policy transformation in this paper. And I try to examine whether this foreign policy had really acted beyond the “national interest” or towards the “common human interest”, which brought the end of “Cold War” and the beginning of the “New World Order”.
    My conclusion is that “the foreign policy elites”, theoretically or pragmatically, had never wanted to damage the “national interest”, and that these officials who conducted the perestroika foreign policy have always though of their own state's interest as a “great power”. We can not, therefore, distinguish the perestroika foreign policy from their so-called “cold peace” policy.
    In the period of perestroika, we relied too much on their description over their foreign policy. And today we still do so. We sometimes exaggerate the changes in a state's conduct in international affairs. With such attitudes continuing, we may never find the appropriate perspectives towards the real changes of the “grobal system”.
  • Note The Portrait of Schools in the Soviet International Law
    Iwashita Akihiro
    Seiji kenkyu, 42, 39, 69, Kyushu University, 31 Mar. 1995
    Japanese, Research institution, はじめに―取材の目的― 一 「平和共存の旗手」―ザドロージヌイの「素顔」 二 「ブレジネフ・ドクトリン」再考―ウセンコの「弁明」 三 連邦制下の「民族主権」―トゥズムハメードフの「真意」 四 「異端」の実像―ブリシチェンコの「孤立」 五 「組織者」の横顔―ヴェレェシチェチンの「役割」 おわりに―取材の射程―
  • ロシア外交の変容--中国との関係を手がかりに—新外交の模索<特集>
    岩下 明裕
    ロシア研究 / 『ロシア研究』編集委員会 編, 19, p22, 41, 東京 : 日本国際問題研究所, Oct. 1994, [Peer-reviewed]
    Japanese, 資料形態 : テキストデータ プレーンテキスト
    コレクション : 国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション > デジタル化資料 > 雑誌
  • 転換期の国際連合--第47回国連総会ブッシュ米大統領演説・全訳と解説
    岩下 明裕
    政治研究, 40, p111, 124, 福岡 : 九州大学政治研究会, Mar. 1993
    Japanese, 記事分類: 政治・行政--国際関係
  • ゴルバチョフ時代の国家主権論争--国際法理論の転換を中心に
    岩下 明裕
    政治研究, 39, p53, 75, 福岡 : 九州大学政治研究会, Mar. 1992
    Japanese, 記事分類: 法律・司法--国際法--公法
  • ソビエト国際法学会の光芒--戦後の理論上の展開を中心に
    岩下 明裕
    Annals of the Japanese Association for Soviet and East European Studies, 1992, 21, 92, 100, THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION FOR RUSSIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN STUDIES, 1992, [Peer-reviewed]
    Japanese, 資料形態 : テキストデータ プレーンテキスト
    コレクション : 国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション > デジタル化資料 > 雑誌
    記事分類: 法律・司法--国際法
  • 戦後ソビエト対外政策の一展開--フルシチョフ期における理論的枠組の形成と確定
    岩下 明裕
    政治研究, 37, p53, 99, 福岡 : 九州大学政治研究会, Mar. 1990
    Japanese, 記事分類: 政治・行政--国際関係--海外

Other Activities and Achievements

Books and other publications

Affiliated academic society

  • 地域研究コンソーシアム               
  • ロシア東欧学会               
  • JIBSN               
  • JCBS               
  • ボーダーツーリズム推進協議会               
  • Associataion for Borderlands Studies               
  • THE JAPAN ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS               

Research Themes

  • Cooperation and Conflict over International Rivers: Interdisciplinary Study on the Formation and Implementation of Norms and Conflict Structure
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    01 Apr. 2024 - 31 Mar. 2029
    地田 徹朗, 山田 哲也, 星野 昌裕, 岩下 明裕, 都留 康子, 岡松 暁子, 大八木 英夫, 篭橋 一輝
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A), Nagoya University of Foreign Studies, 24H00141
  • Representations of "Territory" and Social Transformation in Northeast Asia
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    01 Apr. 2020 - 31 Mar. 2025
    岩下 明裕, 福原 裕二, BOYLE EDWARD, 黒岩 幸子, 益尾 知佐子
    本研究では、ユーラシアや諸外国の事例を参考にしつつ、北東アジアに関わる国境・領土をめぐる社会構築と実態の連関を、時系列と地理スケールを変えることを通じナショナルとローカルのフレームにおいて析出する。
    ローカルとは境界に接する自治体レベルの場合もあれば、国境点(まち)そのものもあり、スケールは伸縮される。フレームの相互作用を検証し、領土をめぐる社会構築が、ある場合にはナショナリズムの激化と相関し、ある場合にはこれを鎮静化させる二面性パターンを解析する。国境を越えるローカルな場からの「メッセージ」を学術的に総合し、領土をめぐる社会構築を相対化し乗り越える道筋をつくるのが本研究の狙いである。
    空間や境界をめぐる諸問題を学際的に研究するボーダースタディーズ(境界研究)の理論と枠組をもとに、本研究では北東アジア地域の「領土」(領海、領空、経済水域などを含む)をめぐる表象を実態との連関において検証する。争点化されている空間をめぐる対象は、ロシア、中国、韓国(北朝鮮)、日本など北東アジア地域の構成国の社会的な表象の構築の分析を中心とするが、域外の諸地域・諸国などにも目配りし、比較を通じて、それぞれの「領土」に関わる実態と表象の特性を明確にする。かかる作業を通じて境界地域を安定と平和の表象に転換するための諸策を世界的研究の文脈のなかで再構築する。
    なお、昨今のコロナ禍の世界的な広がりは、ナショナルとローカルのフレームを大きく揺さぶりつつあり、当該研究テーマたる国家や領土を分析する際、実態においても社会構築においても考慮せざるをない影響力をもつ。本研究はこれらについても目配りしつつ、地域の変貌を追跡する。
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Hokkaido University, 23K20141
  • Representations of "Territory" and Social Transformation in Northeast Asia
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    01 Apr. 2020 - 31 Mar. 2025
    岩下 明裕, 福原 裕二, BOYLE EDWARD, 黒岩 幸子, 益尾 知佐子
    本研究では、ユーラシアや諸外国の事例を参考にしつつ、北東アジアに関わる国境・領土をめぐる社会構築と実態の連関を、時系列と地理スケールを変えることを通じナショナルとローカルのフレームにおいて析出する。
    ローカルとは境界に接する自治体レベルの場合もあれば、国境点(まち)そのものもあり、スケールは伸縮される。フレームの相互作用を検証し、領土をめぐる社会構築が、ある場合にはナショナリズムの激化と相関し、ある場合にはこれを鎮静化させる二面性パターンを解析する。国境を越えるローカルな場からの「メッセージ」を学術的に総合し、領土をめぐる社会構築を相対化し乗り越える道筋をつくるのが本研究の狙いである。
    空間や境界をめぐる諸問題を学際的に研究するボーダースタディーズ(境界研究)の理論と枠組をもとに、本研究では北東アジア地域の「領土」(領海、領空、経済水域などを含む)をめぐる表象を実態との連関において検証する。
    争点化されている空間をめぐる対象は、ロシア、中国、韓国(北朝鮮)、日本など北東アジア地域の構成国の社会的な表象の構築の分析を中心とするが、域外の諸地域・諸国などにも目配りし、比較を通じて、それぞれの「領土」に関わる実態と表象の特性を明確にする。かかる作業を通じて境界地域を安定と平和の表象に転換するための諸策を世界的研究の文脈のなかで再構築する。
    なお、昨今のコロナ禍の世界的な広がりは、ナショナルとローカルのフレームを大きく揺さぶりつつあり、当該研究テーマたる国家や領土を分析する際、実態においても社会構築においても考慮せざるをない影響力をもつ。本研究はこれらについても目配りしつつ、地域の変貌を追跡する。
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Hokkaido University, 20H01460
  • Multi-Archival Analysis of Critical Junctures in Post-war Northeast Asia
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    01 Apr. 2019 - 31 Mar. 2024
    Wolff David, 李 鍾元, 岩下 明裕, 泉川 泰博, 楠 綾子, 井上 正也, 松本 はる香
    On October 15-18, 2021 a workshop on “Japan and the Korean Peninsula in the Cold War” was sponsored by Kaken A and held at the Graduate School of Asia-Pacific Studies of Waseda University. Papers were prepared and presented by scholars from South Korea, the PRC and Japan, covering a range of topics concentrated in the second half of the Cold War.


    Cross-archival research made possible the connection of various initiatives not usually studied together. During the detente era, the Nixon opening to China brought on a brief period of relaxation on the Korean peninsula, as well as Japan’s outreach to China. The end of the Vietnamese war brought an end to this hiatus as Kim Il Sung prepared to turn the tide agains the “imperialists” in Asia. A few years later, Carter’s plan to withdraw US troops from South Korea also had implications and connections to Japan. Finally, the shifts of perestroika revealed a fluid conjuncture where, in Northeast Asia, the Korean peninsula was the focal point of new relations and missed opportunities. But the promise of Seoul’s Nordpolitik was never fully met, since it produced an opening to the USSR, but not to North Korea, the ultimate objective.


    A sponsored panel at the International Studies Association Convention went further to include analysis of all members of the incipient Quad, including India and Australia.
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A), Hokkaido University, 19H00575
  • Chinese Cross-border Consumption in Northeast Asia: Impact on Economy and Politics
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    10 Nov. 2017 - 31 Mar. 2020
    岩下 明裕, PULFORD EDWARD
    今年度はこれまでの研究成果をもとに研究報告を1つ、その他、業績にある論文、書籍などを刊行した。
    なお当該研究の概要であるが、本プロジェクトの成果の最大の特徴は、当該テーマの分析に際し、人類学的な手法を用いることにある。北東アジアの国境地域は、ロシア人、中国人、北朝鮮人、少数民族などが交錯する場としてよく知られているが、消費行動という研究テーマにおいては多くが経済学的な統計処理による分析、あるいは企業アクターなどを注視した経営学的な解析、移民の移動に焦点をあてた社会学的な分析が主たるものであった。消費行動についてひとりひとりのきめ細かいフォローと彼らの有するフィジカルかつメンタルな実態を明らかにしようとするアプローチは旧来にないものであり、その成果が上記論文及び国際会議において発信されている。
    さらに付言すれば、プルフォード氏の研究のテーマは、「北東アジア」と「国境」をテーマとしており、これは私が主宰する人間文化研究機構(NIHU)地域研究推進事業北海道大学スラブ・ユーラシア研究センター拠点の学術活動及び境界研究ユニット(UBRJ)の諸研究と合致するものでもあった。とくに北東アジアというスケールでの中国人の越境性と、にもかかわらず中国的な特色ある行動性の両面へ目配りする研究は、境界研究(ボーダースタディーズ)の観点からも興味深く、センター滞在中には日本全国で開催されたセミナーや研究会などで数多くの報告をすることとなった。
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows, Hokkaido University, 17F17739
  • Comparative Study on Border Tourism in East Asia: Changing Society in Border Regions and its Impact on International Relations with Neighboring States
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    01 Apr. 2017 - 31 Mar. 2020
    Hanamatsu Yasunori
    Border tourism is promoted by borderlands (border regions) that take advantage of geographical proximity, mutual intimacy, political, economic and cultural “unfamiliarity” while being influenced by intergovernmental relations. Human interaction with tourists from neighboring countries brought by border tourism usually promotes the simultaneous interaction of de-bounding, re-bounding, and neo-bordering processes. In addition, the impact of border tourism on neighboring countries’ relations is an issue that needs to be clarified in the future when the basic condition for border tourism has been lost due to the deterioration of Japan-South Korea relations, Covid-19, and the Ukrainian War.
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), 17H02491
  • Borders in Global Relations
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    01 Apr. 2017 - 31 Mar. 2019
    岩下 明裕
    本研究は、グローバル化に関する諸問題を地域横断的に多様なディシプリンを用いて行うのみならず、境界を越え、世界規模で起きる現象の追跡と分析に目配りしつつも、重層的なグローバル化のもとで、絶えず消失し、再生される空間及び人と人の相関における領域化や境界付けを総合的に把握しようとするものである。本研究では、一見グローバル化とはネガの関係に見えるボーダー(境界)の問題群がグローバル化とコインの表裏の関係であることを前提に、旧来の研究視座では読み解くことのできない問題群と本質を逆照射し、かつ実践的な解析や対応策を見出そうと努めようとする。1)アジア・ユーラシアの境界事象(再領域化・囲い込み)とグローバル化した世界の相関を分析し、2)グローバル化するborderization とtrans-borderizationの相関を地域間比較によって試み、3)グローバル化と境界問題の理論的総合を目指す、という課題設定がそれである。
    最終年度にあたる平成30年度は上記の設定にかんがみ、本新学術領域研究で展開されている諸研究を鳥瞰し、当該研究成果の発信に努めた。Association for borderlands Studiesの第2回世界大会(ウィーン、ブタペスト)、世界政治学会(IPSA)(ブリスベン)などで政界の報告を行い、また福岡で開催された世界社会科学フォーラム(WSSF)で複数のパネルを組織した。成果の共有のために、モスクワ、ヘルシンキ、バーミンガム、ワシントンDC,シアトル、サンディエゴで関係する研究者と学術交流を行った。
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (Research in a proposed research area), Kyushu University, 17H05120
  • New Developments in Sino-Russian Relations: Comprehensive Research on Strategic Partnership
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    01 Apr. 2015 - 31 Mar. 2019
    Wolff David
    This research project collected data on areas of Russo-Chinese cooperation and friction in order to evaluate the chances for rapprochement or even alliance in the next ten years under the Putin and Xi leaderships. In coordination with the National Institute for the Humanities Northeast Asia project, a symposium was held in Sapporo in summer 2018 on “Northeast Asia’s Faultline: One Hundred Years of Sino/Russian/Soviet Competitive Cooperation.” Papers are being edited for a special issue of Eurasian Border Review.
    The most important analytical result of this project is the conclusion that despite China’s caution about getting too close to Russia, Moscow’s steady support on key issues has led, in a very short time, to the US shift from thinking of Russia as the main enemy to a new and unfriendly focus on China. Although China appears to hold the strong hand, Russia’s long-term interest of pitting the US against the PRC has made progress.
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Hokkaido University, 15H03319
  • The Transformation of Political Space and Prospects for New Governance in the Contemporary Phase of Globalization
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    01 Apr. 2015 - 31 Mar. 2018
    Yamazaki Takashi, IWASHITA Akihiro, SAKIHAMA Yasushi, FUKUMOTO Taku
    Upon a 'new' stage of globalization, this research project has grasped the transformation of political spaces, explored various movements and practices to reconstruct political subjects, and attempted to establish political geographies for the prospect of new governance models. On the basis of activities of the Political Geography Research Group of the Human Geographical Society of Japan, this project has hold eleven sponsored/co-sponsored public meetings (including two lectures given by an international guest speaker) and three international meetings in China and Korea. Some of the research outcomes have been published in Masashi Sato and Yosuke Maeda eds. "Local Governance and Region" (Nakanishiya, 2017) and will be published in "The Dictionary of New Geopolitics" (Maruzen, scheduled in 2019). Through the above-mentioned activities so that this project has contributed to the spread of theories, methodologies, and practicability of new political geography to the public.
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Osaka City University, 15H03277
  • Reconstructing International Relations through Border Studies
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    01 Apr. 2014 - 31 Mar. 2018
    IWASHITA Akihiro, KAWAKUBO Fuminori, YAMAZAKI Takashi, YAMANE So, CHIDA Tetsuro, HANAMATSU Yasunori
    This research project has sought to move beyond the analytical methods used in international relations by focussing on the fundamental factors that define international relations, and to establish a new way of studying political geography that is based on the spheres of daily activity of people living in border regions.
    The project has been publicized abroad through panels organized annually with overseas researchers, and through publication in the Principal Investigator’s Introduction to Border Studies: territory, sovereignty, ideology (Chuko Shinsho-in Japanese), and Japan’s Border Issues: Pitfalls and Prospects (Routledge). Regarding border tourism, it has opened new ground for the field.
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A), Hokkaido University, 26245018
  • General Overview of "Comparative Research on Major Regional Powers in Eurasia"
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    13 Nov. 2008 - 31 Mar. 2014
    TABATA Shinichiro, TANG Liang, IWASHITA Akihiro, UYAMA Tomohiko, UEGAKI Akira, YAMANE So, MOCHIZUKI Tetsuo, MATSUZATO Kimitaka, NAGANAWA Norihiro
    1.新学術領域研究「ユーラシア地域大国の比較研究」の日本語での成果は,ミネルヴァ書房から全6巻のシリーズとして刊行される予定であり,平成24年度に2巻発行していたが,平成25年度にも岩下明裕編『ユーラシア国際秩序の再編』と望月哲男編『ユーラシア地域大国の文化表象』の2巻を刊行した。
    2.本新学術領域研究の英語での成果は,Routledge社から田畑伸一郎を編者とし,Eurasia’s Regional Powers Compared - China, India, Russiaというタイトルで,全14章から成る本として刊行することが決まった。執筆者は本新学術領域研究の6つの計画研究の研究代表者,研究分担者などである。そのための原稿の執筆を行い,ほとんどの原稿が3月末までに提出された。
    3.本新学術領域研究の成果を,日本,中国,韓国の研究者による第5回スラブ・ユーラシア研究東アジア学会(2013年8月9~10日,大阪法経大学)をはじめとするいくつかの学会等で報告することを支援した。
    4.本新学術領域研究の成果を,経済の領域における成果を中心に,国立大学附置研究所・センター長会議第3部会シンポジウム「比較研究の愉しみ」(2013年10月4日,北海道大学)で発表した。
    5.本新学術領域研究において2010年に行った国際シンポジウムの成果を,Comparative Studies on Regional Powers, No. 14として刊行した。また,本研究の支援を受けて実施された言語学の領域における研究の成果をSlavic Eurasian Studies, No. 26として刊行した。 6.本新学術領域研究は,世界諸地域の研究に関わる研究組織、教育組織、学会などをつないで, 情報交換や研究活動を進めるネットワーク組織である地域研究コンソーシアムから,第3回(2013年度)地域研究コンソーシアム研究企画賞を受賞した。
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (Research in a proposed research area), Hokkaido University, 20101001
  • Northeast Asia in the Cold War: New Materials and Perspectives
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    2009 - 2012
    DAVID Wolff, AKITA Shigeru, IZUMIKAWA Yasuhiro, IWASHITA Akihiro, ENDO Ken, MATSUMOTO Haruka, YOKOTE Shinji, ROBERT Eldridge, KIM Sung-ho
    This Kaken has combined historians and political scientists to collect documents in and about Northeast Asia in the Cold War, especially Japan’s role and perspective. At workshops, conferences and international events, our members have made 80 presentations of new materials and conclusions during the last five years, more than half in English. The members made 70 publications during this period and many more will follow.
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A), Hokkaido University, 21243013
  • Restructuring of the International Order
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    2008 - 2012
    IWASHITA Akihiro, ISHII Akira, ITO Toru, YOSHIDA Osamu, WOLFF David, NAKAI Yoshifumi
    The results of this research project was to analyze the influences that great powers in Eurasia such as Russia, China and India have on the international community, and to review the kind of new order that the international community will form with these regional powers. It did not simply look into the diplomatic strategies of those three countries, but also shed light on how the existing world order tackles the challenge offered by the Eurasian powers.
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (Research in a proposed research area), Hokkaido University, 20101002
  • An Emerging New Eurasian Order : Russia, China and Their Interactions toward Neighbors
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    2006 - 2009
    IWASHITA Akihiro, UYAMA Tomohiko, OBIYA Chika, YOSHIDA Osamu, ARAI Yukiyasu, ISHII Akira, NAKANO Junzo, KIM Sung-ho, ARAI Nobuo
    The practical results of this study is, firstly, that it proposed the applicability of the "fifty-fifty," or the Sino-Russian way for resolving a disputed territory on the basis of mutual acceptance (in most cases, the territory is divided) to other cases such as in the dispute over the northern territories between Japan and Russian. Secondly, it concludes that the border cooperative body, Shanghai Cooperation Organization, among Russia, China and Central Asia, that has developed within the context of the wider Eurasian community including South/West Asia in collaboration with the US, EU and Japan could pose as a formation of a new order in this region. The theoretical results of this study is, firstly, that Russia and China-a kind of "great border powers," sharing borders with various neighbors-coordinate their foreign relations in different ways than non-border powers such as the US. Secondly, it also features that the Sino-Russian relations, regulated by the borderland and its dynamics, are far from the US-Sino and the US-Russian relations that are not affected by the border. Finally, the study verifies how the Eurasian quadrangle (the US-Russia-China-India) functions differently depending on whether the sub-components or triangles, namely the US-Russia-China, the US-China-India and Russia-China-India, share a border or not.
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A), Hokkaido University, 18203009
  • Unrecognized States in the Former Socialist Countries: multi-layered and Comparative Approaches
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    2005 - 2007
    MATSUZATO Kimitaka, MUTSUSHIKA Shigeo, HIROSE Yoko, MAEDA Hirotake, IWASHITA Akihiro
    In the academic year of 2005, we focused on domestic politics and political regimes of the unrecognized states, as well as on the issues in historiography, ethnic origins and the debate around "who began to inhabit first in the territory." We conducted fieldwork in Nagorno-Karabakh and other territories. In March 2006, we organized a seminar in Sapporo and Tokyo, inviting a historian from Transnistria.
    In the academic year of 2006, we examined how the issue of unrecognized states affected domestic politics of their former suzerains (Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Moldova). We conducted fieldwork in Abkhazia, Transnistria, and at the EU headquarter in Brussels. In February 2007, we organized a seminar on the aforementioned topic, inviting a political scientist from Germany. Moreover, we published a collection in Russian, titled "Historiographic Dialogue around Unrecognized States: Pridnestr, Nagorno-Karabakh, Armenia, South Ossetia, and Georgia."
    In the academic year of 2007, we concentrated our endeavor to publicize the research results internationally. We organized a panel at the annual convention of the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies in New Orleans, inviting specialists from England, Germany, and Mexico. We published a collection in Russian, titled "Transnistria in the Macroregional Context of the Black Sea Rims." This collection demonstrates the future direction of our collective research. Paying attention to the fact that all the post-Soviet unrecognized states emerged in the Black Sea Rims, we will analyze macro-regional backgrounds of this fact.
    During 2006-07, we conducted a contract research to collect biographic data of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic.
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Hokkaido University, 17330025
  • Russo-Chinese Cooperation and Its Implications for Eurasian Security in the Post-Cold War Period
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    2003 - 2005
    IWASHITA Akihiro, ARAI Nobuo, ISHII Akira, NAKANO Junzo, YOSHIDA Osamu
    The contributors of this project consist of researchers in the following fields : Sino-Russian relations, Sino-Central Asian relations, Russo-Japanese relations, Russo-Korean relations, South Asian-Russo-Chinese relations, and Southeast Asian-Sino-Russian relations. The goal of this project was to analyze an emerging Eurasian regional dynamism based on bilateral and multilateral relations. Our team of contributors basically focused their attention on Sino-Russian relations, which have been played out in the heart of Eurasia, and evaluate how these relations affected other relations such as Russo-Japanese, Russo-Korean, Russo-Indian and so on.
    The major result of the project is that it clarified an interaction among those relations, particularly on border cooperation. For the time being, the success of Sino-Russian border relations is contagious : the challenges of the Sino-Russian border were eventually overcome, providing hope that other similar border challenges in Sino-Central and Sino-Southeast Asia can likewise be overcome. The methods adopted for stabilizing border security and finishing border demarcation in the former was applied to the latter. This method could (and should) eventually be applied to Russo-Japanese relations or Sino-Indian relations in near future. A new regional order in Eurasia is on the horizon, and it is one based on the cooperative framework hammered out during tense boarder negotiations between Russia and China.
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Hokkaido University, 15330030
  • Comprehensive Study on Integration of Russia into the World Economy
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    2001 - 2004
    TABATA Shinichiro, KUBONIWA Masaaki, UEGAKI Akira, NAKAMURA Yasushi, IWASHITA Akihiro, SUEZAWA Megumi
    This study revealed the key importance of the oil and natural gas in understanding the Russia's integration into the world economy through a thorough analysis of Russia's official statistics, including SNA (system of national accounts), input-output tables, balance of payments, flow of financial resources and budgetary statistics. Especially, we demonstrated for the first time in the world that profits generated in oil and gas sector were recorded in trade sector in Russia's statistics and they represented the sources for capital flights. We presented these results at the international symposium that we organized in Sapporo and also at panels in academic meetings in the US. These results were published in several international journals. Simultaneously, we investigated the soundness of the above-mentioned Russian statistics. These investigations were carried out as a joint work with statisticians of the Russia's statistical office, and results were also published in international journals.
    We put special emphasis on the role played by the CIS (Commonwealth of Independent States) organization in the process of Russia's integration into the world economy. We organized a group of scholars who studied the CIS from the standpoint of different disciplines such as international relations, securities, economics, politics, sociology and so on. Our contribution is a rather positive evaluation of the role of the CIS in these ten years after the collapse of the USSR, especially in the role of preventing large-scale international and domestic conflicts and of providing various opportunities for adjustment and negotiations. We published for the first time in Japan a book on the CIS and presented these ideas.
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A), HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY, 13303001
  • Russo-Chinese Regional Cooperation and Northeast Asia in the Post-Cold War Period
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    2001 - 2002
    IWASHITA Akihiro
    This research project has been set up to examine issues of the border demarcation and the Chinese migration in the Russo-Chinese relations. The head investigator has tried with foreign advisers to collect a fact of the territorial troubles over the 4000 km border and explore how Russia and China dealt with and succesfully resolved it for both interests. The research project concludes that the border issues between Russia and China has much determined Russo-Chinese relations than international affairs around Northeast Asia.
    All of the fruits of this project were already publishes as "the Russo-Chinese Border 4000 km" (Kadokawa Shoten), and will be introduced to Russian, Chinese and other international academic associations.
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C), 13620100
  • 中国・ロシア関係と国境地域協力
    科学研究費助成事業
    1999 - 2000
    岩下 明裕
    東アジアの国際関係を分析する際にもっとも注目に値する、ポスト冷戦時代の中露関係を国境と地域協力をキーワードに読み解いた本研究は、2年にわたる国境地域の現地調査(沿海・ハバロフスク・チタのロシア側国境地域および黒龍江・吉林・内モンゴルの中国側国境地域)と一次資料を駆使した結果、内外において画期的な研究成果を生みだした。それは第1に中露関係全体がすでにモスクワ・北京の中央政府関係によるだけでなく、国境地域の具体的な関係によって規定されはじめていること、第2に国境地域の関係も地域差が拡大しており、チタ・内モンゴルのもっともよい協力モデルが沿海・吉林のもっとも悪いケースと対比され、前者が後者の関係に適用されることで中露関係は好転しうるとの結論を得たことである。
    個別の国境地域間協力の実態については、豊富な現地資料(国境の写真を含む)を盛り込むかたちで主に大学の紀要類に公表した(研究発表3・4)。とくにこれらの論文で指摘した中露間の係争地(領土問題)の詳細は、今回、内外で始めて明らかにされたものである。また地方間関係の分析の前提となるモスクワ・北京の中央政府関係の近況も看過することなく目配りした(研究発表5)。
    上記のように本研究は、内外でも未踏のものであるため、成果を世界に還元すべく積極的に発信を行ってきた。2000年度にはアメリカ(シアトル・ワシントンDC)およびロシア(ウラジオストク)で報告を行い、関連ペーパーをロシア語・英語で公刊した(研究発表1・2・6)。さらに本研究の成果の一部をハジバラ氏(山口県立大学大学院)の協力を得て中国語でも刊行した(研究発表 図書1)。
    日本学術振興会, 奨励研究(A), 山口県立大学, 11720054
  • Changes of Regional Relations in East Central Europe
    Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    1996 - 1997
    HAYASHI Tadayuki, YATABE Junji, NAKAI Kazuo, NAGAYO Suzumu, IEDA Osamu, ITO Takayuki
    1) This study focuses on the changes of international relations in East Central Europe of post-communist era, in particular :
    (a) eastward expansion of NATO and/or the EU,
    (b) sub-regional cooperation (e.g.CEFTA) in Central Europe
    (c) bilateral relations (e.g.ethnic minority problems) in the region,
    (d) relations between foreign policy and domestic factors in each country.
    2) We had interviews with the persons in charge of this matter in the governments and political parties of the Central and East European countries and Russia..
    3) We collected materials on :
    (a) the parliamentary elections (June, 1996) and the Senate elections (November, 1996) in the Czech Republic ;
    (b) Referendum on accession to NATO in Slovakia (May, 1997)
    (c) the parliamentary elections in Poland (June, 1997)
    (d) Referendum on accession to NATO in Hungary (November, 1997)
    4) The main points of the study may be summarized as follows :
    (a) Although Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary have secured their position as the future members of NATO and the EU,there remain many domestic problems to be solved by the time they join in the organizations.
    (b) Slovak democracy is unstable. Consequently, neither NATO nor the EU regard it a future member of them.
    (c) More careful attention must be paid to the effects of the NATO/EU enlargement on the politics of the Baltic countries, Ukraine and South East European countries. The enlargement may have some negative effects on the stability of these countries.
    5) The interim report of this study has been issued as an Occasional Papers of the Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University in March, 1998 and the final reports of this research project will be gathered into a volume in 1999.
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for international Scientific Research, Hokkaido University, 08041043
  • 地域間及び国家間協力関係の展開
    科学研究費助成事業
    1995 - 1997
    林 忠行, 岩下 明裕, 秋野 豊, 横手 慎二, 伊東 孝之, 小泉 直美
    この研究は、スラブ・ユーラシア地域における国際関係の変動分析を目的としていた。そこでの知見としては、つぎの諸点を指摘できる。
    1.ロシアの世諭形成者の間では、多様な自己認識と世界認識が存在し、それらの間での外交政策をめぐる諭争が継続している。さしあたりそれらの認識はa)イデオロギー的西欧派、(1)現実主義的西欧派、(2)現実主義的独自路線派、(3)イデオロギー的独自路線派、(4)大国再生派などに分類できる。
    2.現在のロシアがもつ国境観には、なおかつてのロシア帝国やソ連時代に形成された意識が残存しているが、新しいロシア国家が世界システムに組み込まれる過程で、国境の画定の必要性が認識され、かつ非軍事化された国境管理体制の導入が進みつつある。
    3.ロシアは、カフカ-スや中央アジアでの影響力を急速に失いつつあり、またこの地域では独自の地域意識の形成が見られ、また隣接するロシア以外の諸国や米国が影響力を行使し始めている。こうした過程の中で、この地域には新しい地域国際システムの出現が観察される。
    4.ロシアと中国の間では「パートナーシップ」に墓づく国家間関係が構築されつつあるが、それぞれで「中央」と両国国境地域に位置する「地方」との間での両国関係に関する捉え方の差も観察され、それは両国間関係の不安定要因となっている。
    5.東中欧諸国はNATOおよびEU加盟に向かい、これらの諸国とロシアおよび旧ソ連諸国との関係は急速に変容したが、旧ソ連ブロック内で形成された関係の遺産もなお観察できる。その一例が、スロヴァキアとロシアとの関係で、そこでは強い政治、経済、軍事的な提携関係が残っており、それはスロヴァキアの独自の外交路線に反映されている。
    日本学術振興会, 重点領域研究, 北海道大学, 07206103
  • ユーラシア国境政治               
    Competitive research funding
  • Border Politics in Eurasia               
    Competitive research funding